Review



nasal fluid  (Lee Biosolutions)


Bioz Verified Symbol Lee Biosolutions is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Lee Biosolutions manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Lee Biosolutions nasal fluid
    Nasal Fluid, supplied by Lee Biosolutions, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 3 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+nasal+fluid/Nasal+Fluid%2FMucus%2C+Pooled+Human+Donors/med_rxiv__2024__03__07__24303877-63-8-10
    Average 94 stars, based on 3 article reviews
    nasal fluid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    other:

    Article Title: Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 Viral-Load Curves in Paired Saliva Samples and Nasal Swabs Inform Appropriate Respiratory Sampling Site and Analytical Test Sensitivity Required for Earliest Viral Detection
    Article Snippet: To bring the volume to 800 μL total, 32 μL of healthy human nasal fluid collected prior to November 2019 (Cat No 991-13-P-PreC, Lee Biosolutions) was added.

    Article Title: Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 viral-load curves in paired saliva and nasal swabs inform appropriate respiratory sampling site and analytical test sensitivity required for earliest viral detection
    Article Snippet: To each dilution we added 32 μL of healthy human nasal fluid (Cat No 991-13-P-PreC, Lee Biosolutions) to 768 μL of each dilution for a total volume of 800 μL.

    Article Title: Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 viral-load curves in paired saliva and nasal swabs inform appropriate respiratory sampling site and analytical test sensitivity required for earliest viral detection
    Article Snippet: To each dilution we added 32 μL of healthy human nasal fluid (Cat No 991-13-P-PreC, Lee Biosolutions) to 768 μL of each dilution for a total volume of 800 μL.

    Article Title: Development of a DNA aptamer selection method based on the heterogeneous sandwich form and its application in a colorimetric assay for influenza A virus detection
    Article Snippet: To facilitate the exact diagnosis of multiple influenza virus types that are reported each year, the quantitative, sandwich-format enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is widely used.. In this method, enzyme-linked secondary antibodies or aptamers serve as detection reagents for signal amplification or colorimetric analysis.. Aptamers have similar target affinities and specificities to antibodies, and they are relatively easy to label and can be applied to a variety of methods.

    Article Title: Development of Replication Protein A-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles for Highly Sensitive Detection of Disease Biomarkers
    Article Snippet: Subscriber access provided by Nottingham Trent University is published by the American Chemical Society.. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society.. Copyright © American Chemical Society.

    Article Title: Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 Viral-Load Curves in Paired Saliva Samples and Nasal Swabs Inform Appropriate Respiratory Sampling Site and Analytical Test Sensitivity Required for Earliest Viral Detection
    Article Snippet: Commercial pooled human saliva collected prior to November 2019 (Cat, 991-05-P, Lee Biosolutions, Maryland Heights, MO, USA) for the contrived saliva samples or commercial human nasal fluid collected prior to November 2019 (Cat No 991-13-PPreC, Lee Biosolutions) for the contrived nasal-swab samples.

    Article Title: Highly sensitive and universal detection strategy based on a colorimetric assay using target-specific heterogeneous sandwich DNA aptamer.
    Article Snippet: We newly selected heterogeneous sandwich-type DNA aptamers specific for influenza B virus NP.. Our detection platform improves the sensing efficiency of colorimetric assy via protein engineering.. Long-term colorimetric reagent (STARPA70A@biotin-HRP) storage can be achieved through lyophilization.



    Similar Products

    92
    Innovative Research Inc human nasal fluid
    Human Nasal Fluid, supplied by Innovative Research Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+nasal+fluid/Single+Donor+Human+Nasal+Fluid/bio_rxiv__2024__09__04__611305-143-5-13
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human nasal fluid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Innovative Research Inc single donor human wb
    Single Donor Human Wb, supplied by Innovative Research Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+nasal+fluid/Single+Donor+Human+Nasal+Fluid/bio_rxiv__2024__09__04__611305-143-0-13
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    single donor human wb - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Lee Biosolutions nasal fluid
    Nasal Fluid, supplied by Lee Biosolutions, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+nasal+fluid/Nasal+Fluid%2FMucus%2C+Pooled+Human+Donors/med_rxiv__2024__03__07__24303877-63-8-10
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    nasal fluid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    AstraZeneca ltd human nasal fluid samples
    Human Nasal Fluid Samples, supplied by AstraZeneca ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+nasal+fluid/human+nasal+fluid+samples/pm38052824-258-6-17
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human nasal fluid samples - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    91
    Innovative Research Inc nasal fluid
    Nasal Fluid, supplied by Innovative Research Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+nasal+fluid/Pooled+Human+Nasal+Fluid/pm36748606-37-2-7
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    nasal fluid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    91
    Lee Biosolutions nasal secretion
    Nasal Secretion, supplied by Lee Biosolutions, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+nasal+fluid/Nasal+Fluid%2FMucus%2C+Human+Donor/pm36537790-261-1-10
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    nasal secretion - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Lee Biosolutions sars cov
    Sars Cov, supplied by Lee Biosolutions, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+nasal+fluid/Nasal+Fluid%2FMucus%2C+Pooled+Human+Donors/pmc09887260-5-17-21
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sars cov - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Lee Biosolutions sars cov 2 particles
    Clinical false-positive rate of antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) among participants in a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) household-transmission field study and subsequent laboratory evaluation of technical false-positive rates among Ag-RDT strip lots. A , The biweekly clinical false-positive rate for nasal swab Ag-RDT, defined as a positive Ag-RDT at the same timepoint as negative results by reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in saliva, nasal swabs, and oropharyngeal swab specimens. The proportions displayed below each month represent the number of clinical false-positive results over the total number of false-positive and true-negative Ag-RDT results in the field study during each period. Error bars represent 95% confidence interval (CI). B , Laboratory evaluation of the technical false-positive rate for 4 Ag-RDT strip lots was performed using severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 <t>(SARS-CoV-2)–negative</t> human nasal fluid (see Methods). The proportion of technical false-positive reads to all reads by readers blinded to experimental conditions is displayed below each lot number. P values were obtained using an upper-tailed Fisher exact test. Additional details are provided in .
    Sars Cov 2 Particles, supplied by Lee Biosolutions, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+nasal+fluid/Nasal+Fluid%2FMucus%2C+Pooled+Human+Donors/pmc09887260-5-6-21
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sars cov 2 particles - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    91
    Innovative Research Inc pooled human nasal fluid
    Clinical false-positive rate of antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) among participants in a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) household-transmission field study and subsequent laboratory evaluation of technical false-positive rates among Ag-RDT strip lots. A , The biweekly clinical false-positive rate for nasal swab Ag-RDT, defined as a positive Ag-RDT at the same timepoint as negative results by reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in saliva, nasal swabs, and oropharyngeal swab specimens. The proportions displayed below each month represent the number of clinical false-positive results over the total number of false-positive and true-negative Ag-RDT results in the field study during each period. Error bars represent 95% confidence interval (CI). B , Laboratory evaluation of the technical false-positive rate for 4 Ag-RDT strip lots was performed using severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 <t>(SARS-CoV-2)–negative</t> human nasal fluid (see Methods). The proportion of technical false-positive reads to all reads by readers blinded to experimental conditions is displayed below each lot number. P values were obtained using an upper-tailed Fisher exact test. Additional details are provided in .
    Pooled Human Nasal Fluid, supplied by Innovative Research Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+nasal+fluid/Pooled+Human+Nasal+Fluid/10__1016_slash_j__biosx__2022__100230-94-21-35
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pooled human nasal fluid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Clinical false-positive rate of antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) among participants in a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) household-transmission field study and subsequent laboratory evaluation of technical false-positive rates among Ag-RDT strip lots. A , The biweekly clinical false-positive rate for nasal swab Ag-RDT, defined as a positive Ag-RDT at the same timepoint as negative results by reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in saliva, nasal swabs, and oropharyngeal swab specimens. The proportions displayed below each month represent the number of clinical false-positive results over the total number of false-positive and true-negative Ag-RDT results in the field study during each period. Error bars represent 95% confidence interval (CI). B , Laboratory evaluation of the technical false-positive rate for 4 Ag-RDT strip lots was performed using severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)–negative human nasal fluid (see Methods). The proportion of technical false-positive reads to all reads by readers blinded to experimental conditions is displayed below each lot number. P values were obtained using an upper-tailed Fisher exact test. Additional details are provided in .

    Journal: Open Forum Infectious Diseases

    Article Title: Laboratory Evaluation Links Some False-Positive COVID-19 Antigen Test Results Observed in a Field Study to a Specific Lot of Test Strips

    doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac701

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Clinical false-positive rate of antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) among participants in a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) household-transmission field study and subsequent laboratory evaluation of technical false-positive rates among Ag-RDT strip lots. A , The biweekly clinical false-positive rate for nasal swab Ag-RDT, defined as a positive Ag-RDT at the same timepoint as negative results by reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in saliva, nasal swabs, and oropharyngeal swab specimens. The proportions displayed below each month represent the number of clinical false-positive results over the total number of false-positive and true-negative Ag-RDT results in the field study during each period. Error bars represent 95% confidence interval (CI). B , Laboratory evaluation of the technical false-positive rate for 4 Ag-RDT strip lots was performed using severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)–negative human nasal fluid (see Methods). The proportion of technical false-positive reads to all reads by readers blinded to experimental conditions is displayed below each lot number. P values were obtained using an upper-tailed Fisher exact test. Additional details are provided in .

    Article Snippet: We created contrived specimens using heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 particles (BEI, catalog number NR-52286, lot 70034991) spiked into commercial SARS-CoV-2–negative human nasal fluid (Lee BioSolutions, catalog number 991-13-P, lot 03f4044 and catalog number 991-13-P-PreC, lot 09F3280) at concentrations above and below the inferred limit of detection (LOD) for this assay (7 × 10 copies/mL) [ ] and applied them to 2 lots of test strips (152194 and 152532) that did not yield any false-positive results among participants in the field study.

    Techniques: Diagnostic Assay, Transmission Assay, Stripping Membranes, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Quantitative RT-PCR